Powered by
21:23 CET
E³ 24A - Acute pancreatitis
Abdominal Viscera
Wednesday, February 27, 12:30 - 13:30
Room: C
Type of session: E³ - The Beauty of Basic Knowledge: Pancreas
Topic: Abdominal Viscera
Moderator: M. Laniado (Dresden/DE)

Atlanta Classification of acute pancreatitis
T. L. Bollen; Nijmegen/NL
Learning Objectives

1. To understand grading of acute pancreatitis: Atlanta Classification.
2. To learn about the clinical impact of Atlanta Classification.
3. To understand the follow up of acute pancreatitis.


The 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification (RAC) distinguishes between clinical severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) based on clinical parameters and morphologic severity based on CT parameters. The RAC defines three grades of clinical severity with increasing morbidity and mortality rates: Mild AP: defined as the absence of systemic or local complications. Moderately severe AP: defined as the presence of transient organ failure, deteriorating pre-existing co-morbid disease and/or presence of local complications requiring prolonged stay or intervention. Severe AP: defined as persistent organ failure (>48 h). Morphologically, interstitial and necrotising pancreatitis are discriminated, depending on the absence or presence of tissue necrosis, respectively. In general, patients with interstitial pancreatitis have clinically mild disease, and conversely, most patients with necrotising pancreatitis will sustain clinically severe AP. CT findings, however, are not absolutely predictive of outcome for an individual patient. Approximately 5% of patients with minimal changes on CT will have significant complications with mortality of around 1-3%. An even larger number of patients, up to 30%, will have a relatively benign clinical course despite the presence of pancreatic necrosis. Therefore, ultimate severity of disease is based on clinical parameters, primarily organ failure. CT is regarded as the frontline imaging technique for full evaluation of AP severity, especially in those who are predicted severe by clinical assessment. Follow-up studies are dictated by clinical findings that include sudden-onset or increase of abdominal pain and organ failure, signs of sepsis or other clinical signs of local complications or when invasive treatment is contemplated.

Role of imaging
C. Triantopoulou; Athens/GR
Learning Objectives

1. To learn about diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.
2. To understand how to apply Atlanta Classification to imaging.
3. To learn about new trends in diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.


Imaging is frequently recommended in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) to confirm the clinical diagnosis, ascertain the cause, grade the extent and severity of the disease, evaluate severe complications and indicate interventional procedures. The revised 2012 Atlanta criteria for classification of the severity of AP are widely accepted. The challenge for imaging remains to recognise patients suffering from severe or moderately severe AP. But, a direct correlation between clinical severity and morphology may not exist. Imaging is of utmost importance in the 2nd phase of the disease evolution (usually >2 weeks after onset) where AP resolves or evolves secondary to the presence of necrosis and infection, thus morphologic criteria are needed as defined by imaging techniques. It is important to evaluate the extent of necrosis (intrapancreatic, extrapancreatic or both) and also to define if this is sterile or infected. Contrast-enhanced CT is the best technique; however the staging of severity and detection of complications depend on the timing of CT scanning. In the first 24-48 hours, the CT findings of necrosis may be equivocal. In severe AP, unless the patient is critically ill and in need of emergency intervention, the initial CT scan should ideally be obtained at least 72 hours following symptoms onset. As 50% of AP cases are gallstone-related, transabdominal ultrasound is the most common initial radiologic investigation of choice. MRI can better differentiate complex fluid collections from mature pseudocysts and hemorrhagic collections, while MRCP is the best technique to identify pancreatic duct disconnection.

This website uses cookies. Learn more